On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* >>> confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least >>> structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of >>> source are one of the few things the version control time machine cannot >>> undo (and are sacred things to the ASF as well), I want to be sure of the >>> procedure. Maybe instead of doing the RM job, I could talk you into putting >>> the (presumably less) volunteer time to vetting out the previous work so we >>> can add to the number of folks willing and comfortable being RM? >> >> I think it would be easier for someone to check your work on the 30th >> 2.4.x release ather than a first 2.5/2.6 release. Also, more normal >> testers. Just my 2c. >> > > +1
+1, and +1 for Daniel to RM, thanks!
