Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not able to trigger this error, but this shows, at least IMO, that TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release, unless we are super clear that it is "experimental" or "early access"...
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 4:06 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > wrote: > > > >> Am 14.10.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net>: >> >> Hi, Helmut; >> Note that the vote may run longer than 72 hours as 72 is the minimum. As it >> stands now, we have more than 3 binding +1 votes, but I am waiting for >> closure on the conversation on-list about the tests with reported H2/TLS 1.3 >> failures. Since this is one of the primary features of this release, I want >> to be sure the topic gets due attention. > > See my mail on the other thread. It seems that h2 traffic triggers a call > sequence that exposes a change in OpenSSL behaviour of SSL_read() between > 1.1.0 and 1.1.1. It looks as if mod_ssl interpreted the return codes of > SSL_read() in a way that no longer works and that we need to change mod_ssl > handling here. > > Waiting on confirmation or rebuttal of my analysis on the other thread. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > >> -- >> Daniel Ruggeri >> >> On October 14, 2018 4:44:04 PM CDT, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" >> <tessa...@evermeet.cx> wrote: >> On 2018-10-10 15:18, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >> candidate tarball as 2.4.36: >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz >> sha256: ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288 >> *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz >> >> 72h have passed, so what is the outcome of the vote? >> >
