For me it is a +1, I didn´t say anything because I am not knowledgeable enough.
Stefan, if noone answers it is not because of lack of interest but probably because you are several steps ahead :) El jue, 25 nov 2021 a las 11:26, Greg Stein (<gst...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:42 AM ste...@eissing.org <ste...@eissing.org> wrote: > >... >> >> In its development, the arrival of mod_tls has caused changes in our server >> core. Not in any way related to Rust itself. But we added the capability to >> have more than one SSL/TLS provider in our server. So people can use >> whatever fits best for the parts they need it. >> >> Future improvements in this area would be done easiest, if mod_tls is a >> module in our source base next to mod_ssl. API dependencies are managed >> better if we release enhanced versions together. I see no benefit for anyone >> involved in making it a separate Apache httpd subproject. It has a home on >> github with all its infrastructure. > > > +1 on including mod_tls (or mod_rustls) in our tree as experimental. That is > *precisely* why we have the experimental label. Historically, the concept of > "subproject" has been ... suboptimal, to put it nicely. > > The changes to the core can/should be made regardless of adoption of this > module. > > Cheers, > -g > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat
