Can people share what other projects do? And are there any related ASF
guidelines out there about this?

-Jack

-Jack

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024, 3:57 PM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:

> I didn't realize that the account was curating playlists. I'm trying to
> draw a parallel with the blog post example. Do we consider playlists links?
> I guess the question is whether it looks official. Would inclusion in a
> playlist be mistaken for an endorsement? Or would we get into unnecessary
> debates over what is appropriate for inclusion in a playlist?
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:39 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking at https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheIceberg/playlists, there are
>> also many other talks and even tutorials, what about those?
>>
>> -Jack
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:45 PM Brian Olsen <bitsondata...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Update: I moved the video and playlist to a Private status until this is
>>> discussed. In the meantime, we'll wait to hear some guidance from the PMC
>>> and community to advise. Otherwise, I suggest that Jonathan and Kevin
>>> create an unofficial community Apache Iceberg Meetups channel that follows
>>> the trademark guidelines: https://apache.org/foundation/marks/ but
>>> have asked them to give some time to let others respond.
>>>
>>> Thanks all!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:41 PM Brian Olsen <bitsondata...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Ryan,
>>>>
>>>> I will take that down, apologies for that confusion. I remember having
>>>> some discussion around this before and my recollection was this was more of
>>>> a concern about vendor content but after I read your reply I remembered
>>>> this was a more general ASF sentiment. So with that, I still think
>>>> distributing these through various channels would be valuable, while
>>>> exposing them through playlists. For example, we added the Data Council
>>>> talk you gave a while back where the video is hosted on Data Council's
>>>> channel, but we've added it to the "Iceberg Talks Playlist".
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps this would be a matter of having the PMC create some guidance
>>>> on certain playlists like the meetups playlist I just created and then I
>>>> can add videos from other channels that say Kevin and others own to upload
>>>> Iceberg meetups and we can push visibility to certain videos from their
>>>> channels that meet the criteria (like avoiding talks that are pushing a
>>>> particular vendor or product for example). Would this align more with what
>>>> you have in mind to avoid endorsements?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:59 PM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I strongly prefer not posting meetup videos on an official Apache
>>>>> Iceberg channel.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why we have up until now used the channel only for videos from
>>>>> sanctioned Iceberg events
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheIceberg/videos>, like community syncs
>>>>> or the Apache Iceberg Summit. I wasn't aware that Bits posted the last
>>>>> Seattle meetup video.
>>>>>
>>>>> An "official" distribution channel like this (one controlled by the
>>>>> Iceberg PMC) needs to be careful about posting content because it can be
>>>>> seen as an endorsement and there are reasonable objections around posting
>>>>> some videos (for instance, they are strongly biased to a particular
>>>>> solution or vendor). I don't want the PMC to be in the business of 
>>>>> deciding
>>>>> what gets to be on the official channel or not -- that's a whole set of
>>>>> arguments that I think we want to steer clear of. This is also the reason
>>>>> why the Iceberg site doesn't host blog posts, by the way. We originally 
>>>>> had
>>>>> requests for people to post articles, but I don't think it is wise for the
>>>>> project to decide what opinions can be posted there.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that we should remove the last meetup video and only post
>>>>> content like the community sync videos. For everything else, I think it is
>>>>> a good idea to have a separate channel. We can link to those channels to
>>>>> make them easy to find, but we don't want to be in the middle when someone
>>>>> has an opinion about what should or should not be posted and should not be
>>>>> seen as endorsing any particular solutions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 1:44 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > posting/content management privileges to the Iceberg YouTube
>>>>>> channel for these meetup recordings
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds reasonable to me, when the meetup is recurring. So I am
>>>>>> good with doing this for the Seattle meetup series. We have technically
>>>>>> already done so for Bits for the community sync meeting series.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 1:23 PM Jonathan Leang <
>>>>>> leangjonat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a question related to some questions about shared
>>>>>>> administration of Apache Iceberg social/marketing channels such as 
>>>>>>> YouTube
>>>>>>> in this specific instance. Kevin Liu and I have organized the first 
>>>>>>> Seattle
>>>>>>> Iceberg meetups and it looks like there will be a steady stream of
>>>>>>> technical talks about things like proposals and more generally recent
>>>>>>> developments in the project. Bits (Brian Olsen) helped us get the most
>>>>>>> recent meetup posted on the Apache Iceberg YouTube channel but we're 
>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>> not to bother him every month. We're wondering if Kevin and/or I can get
>>>>>>> posting/content management privileges to the Iceberg YouTube channel for
>>>>>>> these meetup recordings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We asked Bits and he replied:
>>>>>>> It would be good to have some trusted people + PMC coordinate the
>>>>>>> social + marketing channels. In many projects I either see nobody really
>>>>>>> owning it and it becomes abandoned over time and other times I see it
>>>>>>> primarily run through one or two companies or individuals which doesn't
>>>>>>> scale. It would be great if a small group of trusted volunteers comanage
>>>>>>> these marketing channels with similar guidelines on how to coordinate 
>>>>>>> when,
>>>>>>> channel "voice", and following standard ASF COC guidelines, etc...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps Bits and/or a PMC member could take on the responsibility of
>>>>>>> building out the guidance on how to run this without too much overlap or
>>>>>>> interference as it scales out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Jonathan Leang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>> Databricks
>>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Databricks
>

Reply via email to