I like the idea of having a merge queue, so +1 to that. On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi > > Thanks for the idea! > I like to require branches to be up to date before merging: the merge > queue provides basically similar protection, but more "flexible" when > a lot of PRs are merged every day. > > I checked from ASF standpoint, and the merge queue can be enabled > without issue (at infra level). I don't think we need anything in the > .asf.yaml, but if needed we have to create a ticket to infra (if > needed and after consensus here). > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 3:54 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, all: > > > > I want to raise a discussion about enabling merge queue in iceberg > related repositories. > > > > In short, github merge queue improves efficiency of maintainers for repo > with high velocity. When there are several prs ready for merging, instead > of asking the author/maintainer to merge with the main branch manually > before merging, it will put ready to merge prs to a queue, update them to > the latest commit, and run all required checks one by one. When all checks > passed, it will do the merge automatically. > > > > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! >
