Thanks everyone for joining the discussion.

There is no objection or concerns about this, I'll fire a jira ticket to
enable it.

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Peter:
>
> This change will not be exercised by a pr, but apache's infra team.
>
> If we have consensus on this issue, I'll open a ticket in apache jira to
> ask for infra team's help to do it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 9:33 PM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Max has a PR https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13675 which speeds
>> up the tests by running them parallel.
>> While any parallelism introduces potential flakiness, it could halve the
>> CI speed which would be also nice along the changes here.
>>
>> Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. aug. 25.,
>> H, 9:22):
>>
>>> TIL about the merge queue, but I'm all aboard. I think this would be
>>> great to have, especially on the Iceberg Java side where the CI takes some
>>> time to run.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>> Op ma 25 aug 2025 om 08:43 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> I like the idea of having a merge queue, so +1 to that.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the idea!
>>>>> I like  to require branches to be up to date before merging: the merge
>>>>> queue provides basically similar protection, but more "flexible" when
>>>>> a lot of PRs are merged every day.
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked from ASF standpoint, and the merge queue can be enabled
>>>>> without issue (at infra level). I don't think we need anything in the
>>>>> .asf.yaml, but if needed we have to create a ticket to infra (if
>>>>> needed and after consensus here).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 3:54 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hi, all:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I want to raise a discussion about enabling merge queue in iceberg
>>>>> related repositories.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In short, github merge queue improves efficiency of maintainers for
>>>>> repo with high velocity. When there are several prs ready for merging,
>>>>> instead of asking the author/maintainer to merge with the main branch
>>>>> manually before merging, it will put ready to merge prs to  a queue, 
>>>>> update
>>>>> them to the latest commit, and run all required checks one by one. When 
>>>>> all
>>>>> checks passed, it will do the merge automatically.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to