I think the infra team is still working on it. On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 11:01 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was wondering about this feature. Looks like there's still work to be > done on the apache infra side to allow this: > > > We can't enable merge queues for projects just yet, as the required > provenance trail has not been completed. [~dfoulks] is currently working on > getting the last bits set up to make that happen, but it could take a few > weeks to sort out. > > From > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-27180?jql=text%20~%20%22merge%20queue%22 > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 10:23 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Highlighting some snippets from the merge queue documentation >> <https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/merging-a-pull-request-with-a-merge-queue> >> : >> >> > The merge queue provides the *same benefits as the Require branches to >> be up to date before merging branch protection*, but *does not require a >> pull request author to update their pull request branch and wait for status >> checks to finish before trying to merge*. >> >> > The merge queue will ensure the pull request's changes pass all >> required status checks when *applied to the latest version of the target >> branch and any pull requests already in the queue*. >> >> >> Also as a follow up, perhaps we can also consider enabling auto-merge >> for a pull request >> <https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-request> >> . >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 7:07 AM Russell Spitzer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, I think it's definitely worth trying out, and if we do have issues >>> it's easy to just turn it off again. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 3:35 AM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion. >>>> >>>> There is no objection or concerns about this, I'll fire a jira ticket >>>> to enable it. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Peter: >>>>> >>>>> This change will not be exercised by a pr, but apache's infra team. >>>>> >>>>> If we have consensus on this issue, I'll open a ticket in apache jira >>>>> to ask for infra team's help to do it. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 9:33 PM Péter Váry < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Max has a PR https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13675 which >>>>>> speeds up the tests by running them parallel. >>>>>> While any parallelism introduces potential flakiness, it could halve >>>>>> the CI speed which would be also nice along the changes here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. aug. >>>>>> 25., H, 9:22): >>>>>> >>>>>>> TIL about the merge queue, but I'm all aboard. I think this would be >>>>>>> great to have, especially on the Iceberg Java side where the CI takes >>>>>>> some >>>>>>> time to run. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>> Fokko >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Op ma 25 aug 2025 om 08:43 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like the idea of having a merge queue, so +1 to that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the idea! >>>>>>>>> I like to require branches to be up to date before merging: the >>>>>>>>> merge >>>>>>>>> queue provides basically similar protection, but more "flexible" >>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>> a lot of PRs are merged every day. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I checked from ASF standpoint, and the merge queue can be enabled >>>>>>>>> without issue (at infra level). I don't think we need anything in >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> .asf.yaml, but if needed we have to create a ticket to infra (if >>>>>>>>> needed and after consensus here). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 3:54 AM Renjie Liu < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Hi, all: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > I want to raise a discussion about enabling merge queue in >>>>>>>>> iceberg related repositories. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > In short, github merge queue improves efficiency of maintainers >>>>>>>>> for repo with high velocity. When there are several prs ready for >>>>>>>>> merging, >>>>>>>>> instead of asking the author/maintainer to merge with the main branch >>>>>>>>> manually before merging, it will put ready to merge prs to a queue, >>>>>>>>> update >>>>>>>>> them to the latest commit, and run all required checks one by one. >>>>>>>>> When all >>>>>>>>> checks passed, it will do the merge automatically. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
