Hi Iceberg community! I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for geospatial type.
Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as either being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed to be populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed formats, or are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording so that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. P.S There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 Thanks, Milan
