+1 Thanks for tackling this ! Szehon
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Iceberg community! > > I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for > geospatial type. > > Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as either > being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed to be > populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed formats, or > are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording so > that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. > > PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. > > P.S > > There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f > - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 > > Thanks, > Milan > >
