+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Thanks for tackling this ! > Szehon > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Iceberg community! >> >> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for >> geospatial type. >> >> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as either >> being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed to be >> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed formats, or >> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording so >> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >> >> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >> >> P.S >> >> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >> >> Thanks, >> Milan >> >>
