+1 (binding) On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 12:33 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks for getting this clarification done. > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 7:00 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks for tackling this ! >>> Szehon >>> >>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Iceberg community! >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for >>>> geospatial type. >>>> >>>> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as >>>> either being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed to be >>>> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed formats, or >>>> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording so >>>> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >>>> >>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >>>> >>>> P.S >>>> >>>> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >>>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >>>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Milan >>>> >>>>
