+1 (non-binding for me). I left some comments that I think might help with clarity for implementers.
Ryan, given the limited nature of the vote, what do you see as the decision factors for actually using this? Cheers, Micah On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I mentioned in the thread on adding a bitmap format for small bitmaps >> that I think the next steps are to get a draft spec into git (PR #16518 >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16518>) and then iterate on it >> and implementations. That will give us more information to move forward >> with the Mumbling bitmap format in v4 metadata or not. >> >> This vote is to add the spec to version control. It does not mean that we >> are using the format in tables or other places. Those uses will be covered >> by future votes. >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Add the Mumbling bitmap spec >> [ ] +0: . . . >> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec to git because . . . >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ryan >> >
