+1 for getting started with the draft, thanks Ryan ! Best, Prashant
On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:22 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:08 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks > > Szehon > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On 2026/06/09 17:12:39 Russell Spitzer wrote: > >> > +1 for having the draft up > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:32 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:05 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I'm +1 (non-binding) to get the spec in. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> +1 (binding) for adding this to version control > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:30 PM Péter Váry < > [email protected]> > >> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>>> Seems like a good way forward, even if we need to iron out the > details. > >> > >>>> We will need a good compression for the delete vectors if we > would like > >> > >>>> to store then in the metadata files. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> +1 for adding an initial draft > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. > jún. 9., > >> > >>>> K, 2:47): > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>>> I had a comment about the exception offsets, but +1 (binding) > from me. > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:08 PM Micah Kornfield < > [email protected]> > >> > >>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding for me). > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> I left some comments that I think might help with clarity for > >> > >>>>>> implementers. > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Ryan, given the limited nature of the vote, what do you see as > the > >> > >>>>>> decision factors for actually using this? > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >> > >>>>>> Micah > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> +1 from me > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> I mentioned in the thread on adding a bitmap format for small > >> > >>>>>>>> bitmaps that I think the next steps are to get a draft spec > into git (PR > >> > >>>>>>>> #16518 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16518>) and > then > >> > >>>>>>>> iterate on it and implementations. That will give us more > information to > >> > >>>>>>>> move forward with the Mumbling bitmap format in v4 metadata > or not. > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> This vote is to add the spec to version control. It does not > mean > >> > >>>>>>>> that we are using the format in tables or other places. > Those uses will be > >> > >>>>>>>> covered by future votes. > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Add the Mumbling bitmap spec > >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . > >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec to git because . . . > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Ryan > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >
