+1 (binding)
On 2026/06/09 17:12:39 Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 for having the draft up > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:32 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:05 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'm +1 (non-binding) to get the spec in. > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (binding) for adding this to version control > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:30 PM Péter Váry <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Seems like a good way forward, even if we need to iron out the details. > >>>> We will need a good compression for the delete vectors if we would like > >>>> to store then in the metadata files. > >>>> > >>>> +1 for adding an initial draft > >>>> > >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. jún. 9., > >>>> K, 2:47): > >>>> > >>>>> I had a comment about the exception offsets, but +1 (binding) from me. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:08 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding for me). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I left some comments that I think might help with clarity for > >>>>>> implementers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ryan, given the limited nature of the vote, what do you see as the > >>>>>> decision factors for actually using this? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Micah > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 from me > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I mentioned in the thread on adding a bitmap format for small > >>>>>>>> bitmaps that I think the next steps are to get a draft spec into git > >>>>>>>> (PR > >>>>>>>> #16518 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16518>) and then > >>>>>>>> iterate on it and implementations. That will give us more > >>>>>>>> information to > >>>>>>>> move forward with the Mumbling bitmap format in v4 metadata or not. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This vote is to add the spec to version control. It does not mean > >>>>>>>> that we are using the format in tables or other places. Those uses > >>>>>>>> will be > >>>>>>>> covered by future votes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Add the Mumbling bitmap spec > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec to git because . . . > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ryan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >
