Hello, Dmitriy. Thank you for feedback!
> Will it be supported? Yes. TDE shouldn't broke any of existing Ignite features. It adds some encrypt/decrypt level when we writing and reading pages in/from PDS. В Пт, 02/03/2018 в 07:29 +0300, Dmitriy Setrakyan пишет: > I have looked at the design, but could not find anything about running SQL > queries against the encrypted data. Will it be supported? > > D. > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hell, Dima! > > > > Thank you for document! > > > > I'm ready to implement this feature with you. > > > > Igniters, please, share you thoughts about proposed design > > > > [1] https://1drv.ms/w/s!AqZdfua4UpmuhneoVhOCiXSUBGIf > > > > В Чт, 01/03/2018 в 15:46 +0300, Дмитрий Рябов пишет: > > > Hello, Igniters! > > > > > > I investigated the issue and wrote some details in a draft document > > > [1]. I think we should made IEP for TDE because it is a big change and > > > should be described in a single place, but not in a message > > > conversation. > > > Please, look it and write your thoughts. What is not understandable, > > > what should be detailed or described? > > > > > > > Where are we going to store keys (MEK) physically? Would it be PKCS#11 > > > > storage? Where we will store passwords to unlock storage or it will be > > > > responibilty of user? > > > > > > I think we should provide interface for MEK storage to let users use > > > storages they want. I suppose at the first step we should provide very > > > simple implementation, which will store MEK on every node and MEK will > > > be extracted by administrator during cluster activation process. Once > > > MEK is extracted from key store, we decrypt CEKs and destroy open MEK, > > > leaving open only cache keys. > > > > > > I think external storage is user's worry and we shouldn't give users > > > built-in external storage like Oracle Wallet or Microsoft Azure Key > > > Vault because it will increase Ignite's complexity too much. > > > > > > And yes, we should to comply with the standards like PKCS#11. > > > > > > > One more thing is how "node gets MEK from coordinator", if we send > > > > cleartext MEK, such security becomes useless also. > > > > > > Yeah, that's why we should use secured connection. As I know, we have > > > SSL implementation over JDK implementation, am I right? But we must > > > ensure to use latest SSL/TLS version. > > > > > > [1] https://1drv.ms/w/s!AqZdfua4UpmuhneoVhOCiXSUBGIf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
