Hi Alexander, I did not quite understand how this list of top tests was obtained. It does not look like sorted.
Can you clarify? Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov пн, 14 мая 2018 г. в 20:48, Александр Меньшиков <sharple...@gmail.com>: > Vyacheslav, > I have made a simple ranking for your data for highlighting classes which > more than other needs testing. > > Please take a look at the list which I have done (36 classes): > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RJrtnN77MeEWLTShFzqaLInCdOSb9WdC/view?usp=sharing > > > Below you can read how did it in details: > > First I have removed all small classes (less than 200 lines), classes with > more than 80% coverage, and with 0% (too strange result). > After that, I have extracted subset which dominates other classes by two > parameters: coverage and complexity. > It means all other classes have not less coverage and not greater > complexity, and also better at least at one of these parameters. > > Finally, I have sorted this list by value "coverage/complexity". >
