Well, at least name should be changed, IMO, as the API function name should say what we do, and not how we do it. For example, cache_id() looks better to me than hashcode().
Best Regards, Igor On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:22 PM Dmitry Melnichuk < dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com> wrote: > Dmitriy, > > The short answer is: Python client uses hash code (or any cache > identifier) instead of Java Cache object, since such an abstraction is > not necessary in Python. > > As for why (IMO) Cache object may be needed in Java, but not in Python − > the main reason is the difference in typing systems of both languages. > > On 07/25/2018 06:52 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > Dmitriy, > > > > To be honest, I got a bit lost in such a big email. Can you tell us > briefly > > - why do we not need the hash code on API in Java and we do need it in > > Python? > > > > D. > > >
