Igor,That is a very good point. It just did not cross my mind during the implementation of this function, that the cache identifier can be abstract. I will fix that.
On 07/26/2018 01:46 AM, Igor Sapego wrote:
Well, at least name should be changed, IMO, as the API function name should say what we do, and not how we do it. For example, cache_id() looks better to me than hashcode(). Best Regards, Igor
