Also I remember there are no hashcodes for NodeJS clients
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I am still confused. Let's work through an example. Suppose I have a cache
> named "my_cache" and I want to put an entry with key "a" and value "1".
>
> In Java, this code will look like this:
>
>
> > *IgniteCache<...> myCache = ignite.cache("my-cache");myCache.put("a",
> 1);*
>
>
> How will the same code look in Python?
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Dmitry Melnichuk <
> dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > That is a very good point. It just did not cross my mind during the
> > implementation of this function, that the cache identifier can be
> abstract.
> > I will fix that.
> >
> >
> > On 07/26/2018 01:46 AM, Igor Sapego wrote:
> >
> >> Well, at least name should be changed, IMO, as the API function name
> >> should say what we do, and not how we do it. For example, cache_id()
> >> looks better to me than hashcode().
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >
>
--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
