Hello! I think that having both options is indeed preferable.
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev 2018-07-26 16:51 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Melnichuk <dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com> : > Hi, Ilya! > > I considered this option. Indeed, the code would look cleaner if only one > kind of identifier (preferably the human-readable name) was used. But there > can be a hypothetical situation, when the user is left with hash code only. > (For example, obtained from some other API.) It would be sad to have an > identifier and not be able to use it. > > Now I really think about using hash codes and names interchangeably, so > both > > ``` > cache_put(conn, 'my-cache', value=1, key='a') > ``` > > and > > > ``` > cache_put(conn, my_hash_code, value=1, key='a') > ``` > > will be allowed. > > This will be a minor complication on my side, and quite reasonable one. > > > On 07/26/2018 10:44 PM, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> Why not use cache name as string here, instead of cache_id()? >> >> cache_put(conn, 'my-cache', value=1, key='a') >> >> Regards, >> >>
