I've caught a bug [1] in FsyncModeFileWriteAheadLogManager. It looks like a release blocker to me.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9776 вт, 2 окт. 2018 г. в 13:14, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>: > Hi Anton, > > I definitely agree it is a blocker. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > вт, 2 окт. 2018 г. в 13:09, Anton Kalashnikov <kaa....@yandex.ru>: > > > Hi Igniters. > > > > I have one more possible blockers - deadlock in archiver - > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9761. I almost fixed it. > > It seems it should be include to scope. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > > > > 02.10.2018, 00:08, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > Thanks, got it. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:14 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Here I agree with Vladimir. Furthermore, I do my absolute best to > > finalize > > >> all reviews in all 2.7 tickets I'm related to. I think most of the > > >> contributors doing the same. > > >> > > >> пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 23:03, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: > > >> > > >> > This is precisely the scope we have at the moment. All these > tickets > > were > > >> > considered carefully on whether to include them into AI 2.7 scope. > I > > >> would > > >> > say that 10-15% of current tickets may be moved furhter. > > >> > > > >> > Third of current tickets are features on their final review stages > > (e.g. > > >> > TDE, MVCC invoke, TensorFlow, Thin Clients), another big part is > > >> > stabilization tickets (mainly - various test failures), and another > > big > > >> > part is infrastructure (adopting new modules, Java 9+ support, > > etc.). So > > >> > despite big absolute number, most of these tickets are grouped > around > > >> > several big areas, and overall progress over this week should be > very > > >> good. > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > If this filter is for 2.7 release, then I do not believe all > these > > >> > tickets > > >> > > will be closed. It would be nice to leave only "must-have" > tickets > > in > > >> 2.7 > > >> > > and move the rest to 2.8. > > >> > > > > >> > > D. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:02 AM Vladimir Ozerov < > > voze...@gridgain.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Igniters, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please use this filter, as it properly handles tickets without > > >> > > components: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.7%27)%20AND%20status%20NOT%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20and%20(component%20is%20null%20or%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation)))%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM Nikolay Izhikov < > > nizhi...@apache.org> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I announce scope freeze for an Apache Ignite 2.7 release. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > It means: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 1. We add to 2.7 only critical bugs. > > >> > > > > 2. We merge to 2.7 branch only previously announces features. > > >> > > > > 3. I expect we should exclude or *MERGE ALL TASKS FOR 2.7 DUE > > TO > > >> > > OCTOBER > > >> > > > > 10*. > > >> > > > > So the *October 10 is DEADLINE* for new features. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > For now we have 34 In Progress tickets planned to 2.7 version > > [1]. > > >> > > > > So is you assigned to any of this ticker friendly reminder > #1, > > *the > > >> > > > > deadline is near :)*. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > [1] > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8803?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.7%27)%20AND%20status%20NOT%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20and%20component%20!%3D%20documentation%20)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > В Пн, 01/10/2018 в 16:13 +0300, Andrey Gura пишет: > > >> > > > > > Agree with Andrey. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > IGNITE-9723 will be merged to ignite-2.7 branch soon. > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:56 PM Andrey Kuznetsov < > > >> stku...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Igniters, > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > There is an inaccuracy in critical worker termination > > >> detection, > > >> > > and > > >> > > > > I'm > > >> > > > > > > working on a fix right now, see [1]. Also, we have > trivial > > yet > > >> > > > > important > > >> > > > > > > fix [2], this one is ready to merge. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I deem both should get to 2.7. Any objections? > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9744 > > >> > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9723 > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 13:13, Dmitriy Pavlov < > > >> > dpavlov....@gmail.com > > >> > > >: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Folks, > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > We can consider this thread as an almost healthy > > discussion > > >> > about > > >> > > > SG > > >> > > > > > > > inclusion to 2.7. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For the future, I encourage all Igniters to discuss > > things > > >> > before > > >> > > > > agreement > > >> > > > > > > > on dev.list instead of trying to log 'some pre-build > > >> > agreements' > > >> > > > > here. BTW > > >> > > > > > > > such logged 'agreements' are not always valid. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dev list is not a log of community actions; it is the > > >> principal > > >> > > > > place where > > >> > > > > > > > discussion runs. I sincerely hope all similar decisions > > will > > >> be > > >> > > > > building on > > >> > > > > > > > the dev list. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > >> > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > вс, 30 сент. 2018 г. в 10:49, Nikolay Izhikov < > > >> > > nizhi...@apache.org > > >> > > > >: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hello, guys. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I moved SG tasks to 2.8. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > В Сб, 29/09/2018 в 17:11 +0300, Vladimir Ozerov > пишет: > > >> > > > > > > > > > I fully support Dmitry's concerns. I do not see a > > single > > >> > > chance > > >> > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Service > > >> > > > > > > > > > Grid to be included into 2.7 scope, but we are > still > > >> > keeping > > >> > > > hope > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > alive. > > >> > > > > > > > > > What for? Our experience shows, that any feature > > >> involving > > >> > > > > consensus > > >> > > > > > > > > > algorithms typically take weeks to be finalized > after > > >> > initial > > >> > > > > public > > >> > > > > > > > > > review. Yes, it is possible that at some day in > > October > > >> we > > >> > > will > > >> > > > > see it > > >> > > > > > > > > > completed, but what about testing? What about > > regressions > > >> > > with > > >> > > > > other > > >> > > > > > > > > > components? Let me reming you that from Monday a > lot > > of > > >> > > efforts > > >> > > > > will be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > put > > >> > > > > > > > > > into project stabilization. This is the sole > purpose > > of > > >> > that > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pre-release > > >> > > > > > > > > > phase. Accepting a patch with deep rework of Ignite > > >> > internals > > >> > > > in > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > middle > > >> > > > > > > > > > of that process, means that our effrots will be > lost. > > >> This > > >> > is > > >> > > > > simply a > > >> > > > > > > > > > matter of respect to contributor's time. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Another problem is that this false hope puts us at > > rush. > > >> > Rush > > >> > > > > during > > >> > > > > > > > > > design, development, review, testing. Result is > > known - > > >> bad > > >> > > > > features, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > which > > >> > > > > > > > > > makes damage to the project. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So my question is - why don't we just want to move > > it to > > >> AI > > >> > > 2.8 > > >> > > > > right > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > now? > > >> > > > > > > > > > Feature is big, feature is very far from being > ready. > > >> This > > >> > > > simple > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > action > > >> > > > > > > > > > immediately shifts the focus from dates to quality > > of the > > >> > > > > product, and > > >> > > > > > > > > > remove any risks that potential merge will defeat > > >> > > stabilization > > >> > > > > effrots > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > other contributors. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM Vyacheslav Daradur > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > daradu...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Hot redeployment and versioning will not be > > implemented > > >> > in > > >> > > > > phase 1, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > but it is scheduled once it is finished. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Here is an umbrella ticket [1] to track phase 1 > > scope. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > It includes very few new features, but we > > completely > > >> > rework > > >> > > > > component > > >> > > > > > > > > > > to improve guarantees to be more reliable and we > > build > > >> > the > > >> > > > > base for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > new features. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9607 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:38 PM Dmitriy > Setrakyan < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure I can agree. SG redesign > includes: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > - hot redeployment > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > - versioning > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > In my experience, features like these take > about > > 1 > > >> > month > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > test > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > properly > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > and fix all the bugs, including redeployment > > tests > > >> and > > >> > > > > restart > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > tests > > >> > > > > > > > > on > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > larger topologies, together with overnight > runs. > > If > > >> > this > > >> > > > > type of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > testing > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > has not been performed, I think it would be > > >> > unreasonable > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > expect > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > this > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > feature making it into the release. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone comment on the testing? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:38 AM Dmitriy > Pavlov < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, because I think you're a do'er, but > > not a > > >> > > > > commenter, > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > like > > >> > > > > > > > > me, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > example, I can trust your opinion. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I will join review if I have spare cycles. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 20:34, Denis Magda < > > >> > > > > dma...@apache.org>: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for stepping in and giving more > > context. > > >> In > > >> > > > > general, I'm > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > fully for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > your proposal below: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote goes to option *a*. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should release 2.7 with the > > bunch of > > >> > new > > >> > > > > cool > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > features. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *AND* we should plan 2.8 release at the > > end of > > >> > the > > >> > > > > year with > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > SG > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > redesign > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and MVCC stabilization tasks. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:30 AM Nikolay > > Izhikov > > >> < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > nizhi...@apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we shouldn't put so many emotions > > in > > >> > > > > discussion of > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > any > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribution. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even so big and important as SG redesign. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The crucial point we all agreed about: > > Service > > >> > Grid > > >> > > > > redesign > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > a > > >> > > > > > > > > big > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > feature > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that can significally improve Ignite. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We all want to have it in the product. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me write my vision of the current > task > > >> state: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Design of SG is discussed *and > aligned* > > >> both: > > >> > > > > privately > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > with > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ignite > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experts(Vladimir Ozerov, Alexey > Goncharyuk, > > >> Anton > > >> > > > > Vinogradov, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Denis > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mekhanikov) > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and publicly on dev-list. This task is > > done. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Current PR state - *on my review*. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I spend some time with this contribution > > and > > >> gave > > >> > > > > Vyacheslav > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > a > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > feedback. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I expect he can fix my comments in a day > or > > >> two. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seem we can ask of Anton Vinogradov > review > > on > > >> the > > >> > > > > beginning > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > next > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > week. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If Dmitriy or any community member wants > to > > >> help > > >> > > *by > > >> > > > > doing > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > things, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussing them on dev-list*. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please, join to the review - you are > > welcome. > > >> PR > > >> > is > > >> > > > > here [1] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. I think, we have two mutually > exclusive > > >> > options > > >> > > > > regarding > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.7 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a. We release 2.7 in planned dates. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b. We include SG in release scope. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote goes to option *a*. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should release 2.7 with the > > bunch of > > >> > new > > >> > > > > cool > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > features. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *AND* we should plan 2.8 release at the > > end of > > >> > the > > >> > > > > year with > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > SG > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > redesign > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and MVCC stabilization tasks. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, while we preparing release a lot > of > > >> > things > > >> > > > can > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > happen. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's come back to discussion of SG > release > > >> > version > > >> > > > > *when it > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > will > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ready > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be merged to master*. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guys, does it makes sense for you? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4434 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В Пт, 28/09/2018 в 19:47 +0300, Dmitriy > > Pavlov > > >> > > пишет: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dmitriy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The design is aligned totally. The > > thread you > > >> > > > > mention was > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > named > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > properly. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me some community members > are > > >> > trying > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > take > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > over the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and lead it instead of doing. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a member of the Apache community, I > > value > > >> > > > > Do-ocracy and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > power > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > those > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who do, but not just disagree. There > are > > no > > >> > > leaders > > >> > > > > in open > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > source, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > just > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do'ers. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By do'ers here I mean Nikolay and > > Vyacheslav. > > >> > For > > >> > > > > me, their > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > conclusion > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more weight here. If Vladimir is ready > to > > >> lead > > >> > an > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > additional > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SG > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and SG developers agree, it works for > me. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 19:39, Dmitriy > > >> > Setrakyan < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > dsetrak...@apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We agreed in the beginning of this > > thread > > >> > that > > >> > > > > Service > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Grid > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > changes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > going to make the release because the > > >> > community > > >> > > > > still did > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > approve > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design. Nothing has changed since. I > > have > > >> not > > >> > > > seen > > >> > > > > any > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > design > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussions. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point, I have no confidence > > that > > >> the > > >> > > > > Service Grid > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > changes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it into the 2.8 release. The 2.7 > > release > > >> > seems > > >> > > > out > > >> > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > question > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > altogether. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, Nikolay is a release manager. > We > > >> should > > >> > > let > > >> > > > > him > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > drive the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release. To > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my knowledge, he is doing a great job > > and > > >> the > > >> > > > > release is > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > going > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the schedule he proposed. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:31 AM > Dmitriy > > >> > Pavlov > > >> > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dmitriy, Vladimir, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suggest we stop this nonsense > with > > >> > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > dates-pushing > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > because > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > open question. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just because you disagreed with any > > >> > > > > include/exclude > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > something > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > into > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scope, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not mean that whole community > > >> > disagreed. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If folks will start a separate > > discussion > > >> > > with > > >> > > > > results > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > of the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > review, I > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no reasons to reject their > > contribution, > > >> > even > > >> > > > if > > >> > > > > we > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > need > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > revisit > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > agreements and wait for a couple of > > days > > >> > > more. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am I missing some reason why dates > > are so > > >> > > > > fundamentally > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > important > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 12:20, > Dmitriy > > >> > > > Setrakyan < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If services is not ready, which > it > > is > > >> > not, > > >> > > > > then we > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > should > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > include > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > them > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the next release. There is no > need > > to > > >> > force > > >> > > > > them into > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2.7. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggest we > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move according to the schedule we > > all > > >> > > agreed > > >> > > > > on. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:22 AM > > Dmitriy > > >> > > > Pavlov > > >> > > > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, so correct statement is > > >> "community > > >> > > did > > >> > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > make > > >> > > > > > > > > any > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > decisions > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > services not go to 2.7/ > services > > are > > >> > out > > >> > > of > > >> > > > > scope". > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, please forgive me my > > >> confusion. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 11:19, > > >> Vladimir > > >> > > > > Ozerov < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > voze...@gridgain.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Exactly. So correct statement > > is > > >> “it > > >> > is > > >> > > > up > > >> > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > *community* > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > decide > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whether > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something goes to 2.7”. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 11:11, > > >> Dmitriy > > >> > > > > Pavlov < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it is up to the > > community to > > >> > > > discuss > > >> > > > > after > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > their > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > review > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > results. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в > 11:09, > > >> > > Vladimir > > >> > > > > Ozerov < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > voze...@gridgain.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did I read your words > > correctly > > >> > > that > > >> > > > > it is up > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementor > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of a > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > single > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > feature to decide whether > > >> release > > >> > > of > > >> > > > > all > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > other > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > features > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > delayed? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в > > 11:00, > > >> > > Dmitriy > > >> > > > > Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My point we can wait a > > bit > > >> for > > >> > > > > services > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > because > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 we are open-minded > and > > we > > >> > > don't > > >> > > > > have > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > outside > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pressure > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > October > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 and services it is > not > > >> some > > >> > > new > > >> > > > > feature, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > which > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suddenly > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appeared > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > autumn, it is a well > > known > > >> and > > >> > > > > important > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > feature. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is up to > > Vyacheslav, > > >> > Anton > > >> > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Nikolay > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > decide. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Decisions can be > > services are > > >> > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ready/ready to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > merge > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > master/ready > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to merge to master and > to > > >> 2.7. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в > > 10:46, > > >> > > > > Vladimir > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ozerov < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > voze...@gridgain.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Community agreement > > was to > > >> > > > perform > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > October. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > course > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wait a bit for > > services. > > >> Then > > >> > > we > > >> > > > > wait a > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > bit for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > other > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cool > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ready > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by that time, then > > again > > >> and > > >> > > > > again, and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > never > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while we are waiting > > for > > >> new > > >> > > > > features to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > come, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > already > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > completerd > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot be used by > > anyone. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is why we have > an > > >> > > agreement > > >> > > > > that if > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > feature is > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ready, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moved to future > > release, > > >> > > instead > > >> > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > shifting > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > release. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sole > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reason > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have strict dates > when > > >> > > decisions > > >> > > > > are made > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > is > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > to let > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 > at > > >> 2:22 > > >> > AM > > >> > > > > Dmitriy > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir, I'm not > > >> > searching > > >> > > > for > > >> > > > > enemy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fighting > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happy about cases > > when we > > >> > are > > >> > > > > hurrying. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can't fix test, > > fill > > >> > > ticket > > >> > > > > details, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > can't > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wait > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contributions > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finish their tasks. > > It > > >> is > > >> > > not > > >> > > > > best > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > idea > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > use > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experience > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commercial > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > companies in open > > source. > > >> > Are > > >> > > > > there any > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > pressure > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone promised > > rest of > > >> > > > > features to be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > released > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 30 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > September? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's remember > > principle > > >> > > > > do-orcracy, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > power of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > those > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribor > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does change and > > reviewer > > >> > does > > >> > > > > review, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > let's > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > give > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > right of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > making > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > decision > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to them, but not to > > some > > >> > > closed > > >> > > > > club of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > people > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > privately > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discuss > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 > г., > > >> 23:42 > > >> > > > > Vyacheslav > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Daradur < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > daradu...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Igniters! > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have written > > about > > >> > > > > Service Grid > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > before [1] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finalizing > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution to be > sure > > >> that > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > implementation is > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reliable. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About including > it > > in > > >> > 2.7, > > >> > > if > > >> > > > > we talk > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > that > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > code > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > freeze > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the solution is > not > > >> ready > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > merge > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > yet. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that > > >> prereviewers > > >> > > > Anton > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Vinogradov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Izhikov > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > able to answer if > > >> > solution > > >> > > > out > > >> > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > scope or > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in a > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrey Kuznetsov.
