My own vote is (3) - use git.apache.org as a read/write master. Dan
On 4 November 2012 23:29, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it seems > a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. > > There are three options available: > > 1. carry on using svn. (In this case, I will carry on maintaining an > informal read-only copy on github as a convenience to contributors who > prefer to create patches using git) > 2. use git.apache.org as a read-only clone, with svn remaining as the > master. (This is similar to 1, though git.apache.org is a more formal > copy way of doing this) > 3. use git.apache.org as a read/write master, and retire use of svn for > the Isis codebase. > > As usual, this vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please indicate > your preference as (1), (2) or (3). I have cc'ed to > [email protected] in order to elicit the widest number of views. > > Thanks > Dan > Isis PMC Chair >
