yup, couchdb use git for their codebase, and svn as the backing store for their site (using Apache's CMS). I suggest we follow the same path.
When I IRC'ed with <danielsh> on infra yesterday, it was kinda like, "we just need to know if you are on svn or git..". There are further docs here [1]. [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ On 4 November 2012 23:35, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I did not know that option number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If its > true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) > > - Henry > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Haywood <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > > discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it > seems > > a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. > > > > There are three options available: > > > > 1. carry on using svn. (In this case, I will carry on maintaining an > > informal read-only copy on github as a convenience to contributors who > > prefer to create patches using git) > > 2. use git.apache.org as a read-only clone, with svn remaining as the > > master. (This is similar to 1, though git.apache.org is a more formal > > copy > > way of doing this) > > 3. use git.apache.org as a read/write master, and retire use of svn for > > the > > Isis codebase. > > > > As usual, this vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please indicate > > your preference as (1), (2) or (3). I have cc'ed to > > [email protected] order to elicit the widest number of views. > > > > Thanks > > Dan > > Isis PMC Chair > > >
