3 On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > My own vote is (3) - use git.apache.org as a read/write master. > > Dan > > > On 4 November 2012 23:29, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been >> discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it seems >> a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. >> >> There are three options available: >> >> 1. carry on using svn. (In this case, I will carry on maintaining an >> informal read-only copy on github as a convenience to contributors who >> prefer to create patches using git) >> 2. use git.apache.org as a read-only clone, with svn remaining as the >> master. (This is similar to 1, though git.apache.org is a more formal >> copy way of doing this) >> 3. use git.apache.org as a read/write master, and retire use of svn for >> the Isis codebase. >> >> As usual, this vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please indicate >> your preference as (1), (2) or (3). I have cc'ed to >> [email protected] in order to elicit the widest number of views. >> >> Thanks >> Dan >> Isis PMC Chair >>
-- mailto:[email protected] skype:matthewadams12 googletalk:[email protected] http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
