3 -- Jeroen van der Wal +31 655 874050
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Dan Haywood <[email protected]>wrote: > yup, couchdb use git for their codebase, and svn as the backing store for > their site (using Apache's CMS). I suggest we follow the same path. > > When I IRC'ed with <danielsh> on infra yesterday, it was kinda like, "we > just need to know if you are on svn or git..". There are further docs here > [1]. > > [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > > > On 4 November 2012 23:35, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > I did not know that option number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If > its > > true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) > > > > - Henry > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Haywood < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > > > discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it > > seems > > > a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. > > > > > > There are three options available: > > > > > > 1. carry on using svn. (In this case, I will carry on maintaining an > > > informal read-only copy on github as a convenience to contributors who > > > prefer to create patches using git) > > > 2. use git.apache.org as a read-only clone, with svn remaining as the > > > master. (This is similar to 1, though git.apache.org is a more formal > > > copy > > > way of doing this) > > > 3. use git.apache.org as a read/write master, and retire use of svn > for > > > the > > > Isis codebase. > > > > > > As usual, this vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please > indicate > > > your preference as (1), (2) or (3). I have cc'ed to > > > [email protected] order to elicit the widest number of views. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Dan > > > Isis PMC Chair > > > > > >
