On Feb 5, 2008 9:06 PM, Alex Lukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tuesday 05 February 2008 20:53:46 Christophe Lombart написав: > [skip] > > Alex, > > > > Jackrabbit OCM is also supporting the annotation like JCROM since a long > > time. > > XML support is not mandatory. > Christophe, > I know because I already use it. It works somehow for me and I prefer > official things even when other project looks slightly better. > I speak about "hanging ends" like: > > 1) namespace registration, additional node types registration etc that > ought to be hidden from me somewhere inside of OCM init code.
You are right and also a simpler code to init the ObjectContentManager at least for the annotation stuff. ... Still thinking about that. > > 2) lack of "easy quick start" example. That one on the web is just > misleading and it's much better to replace it with just one line: > "Dig into spources, don't bother reading docs!" Cutting example from tests > is not trivial because of 1) > I know I have the first (and very small) tutorial. I plan to publish it this week but I need more time due to my daily activities :-) Jackrabbit OCM will be more adopted if we find more contributors. They are still many thinks to do and making the doc takes time. So, if you have time , you are welcome .... > > > > Concerning JPA, we can make a small study to check if JPA is really a > good > > solution for a JCR backend ... if someone have time :-) > > Pease do it after examples and docs :) Of course. > > BTW, writing examples makes one to finally understand what a beast was > created and how to eat it right way! :) > > Speacking about missing features in current OCM that can be inspired by > JPA ... well, finders. > -- > SY, Alex Lukin > RIPE NIC HDL: LEXA1-RIPE >
