Hi Francesco, all,

I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen
that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require to
create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute to
skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual IP
to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.

Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from the
GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?

Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.

Thank,
Andrea

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Francesco,
>
> I have mostly finished re-basing  #157 and will open a new PR as soon as we
> finish with #175
>
> Thanks
> -Bhathiya
>
>
> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone
> please
> > review?
> >
> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
> >
> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out of
> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
> >>
> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 are
> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that
> there
> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and then
> >> promote the provider.
> >>
> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi Francesco,
> >>>
> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by soon.
> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by
> Monday.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi all,
> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
> >>>>
> >>>>   1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
> >>>>
> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
> >>>
> >>>>   2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
> >>>>
> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
> >>>> committer
> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute provider
> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this provider,
> but
> >>>> I
> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
> >>>>
> >>>>   1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
> >>>>   2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, after
> >>>> some
> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
> >>>>   3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >>>>   4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> >>>>
> >>>
> > --
> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
> >
> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> > http://www.tirasa.net/
> >
> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to