Sure! Here we go https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-982
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:54 AM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > Thx! > > If the TemplateOptions#networks method is not honored now in Azure (and it > makes sense in the provider), mind opening a JIRA for it too? > El 4/8/2015 8:49, "Andrea Turli" <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > Thanks Ignasi! > > > > Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981 > > > > Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can > > reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint > > in Azure). > > > > Andrea > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider. > > > This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should > > > suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create > > > VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass > > > a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached. > > > > > > Please, open the corresponding JIRAs. > > > > > > > > > Thx Andrea! > > > > > > I. > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378 > > > > > > On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Francesco, all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've > > seen > > > > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not > require > > > to > > > > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using > jclouds-azurecompute > > > to > > > > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a > > Virtual > > > IP > > > > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok. > > > > > > > > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation > from > > > the > > > > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ? > > > > > > > > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed. > > > > > > > > Thank, > > > > Andrea > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Francesco, > > > >> > > > >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as > soon > > > as we > > > >> finish with #175 > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> -Bhathiya > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > ilgro...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could > anyone > > > >> please > > > >> > review? > > > >> > > > > >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead. > > > >> > > > > >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out > > of > > > >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1? > > > >> > Thanks. > > > >> > > > > >> > Regards. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 > > are > > > >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given > that > > > >> there > > > >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and > > then > > > >> >> promote the provider. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Hi Francesco, > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR > by > > > soon. > > > >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it > by > > > >> Monday. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Thanks > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > > > ilgro...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Hi all, > > > >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849) > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest > > > >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850) > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF > > > >> >>>> committer > > > >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as > > > well. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute > > > provider > > > >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps? > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this > > provider, > > > >> but > > > >> >>>> I > > > >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion: > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago > > > >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, > > > after > > > >> >>>> some > > > >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?) > > > >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased > (Bhathiya?) > > > >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?) > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Regards. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> [1] > > > >> >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > > >> > > > > >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > > > >> > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > > >> > > > > >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > > > >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >
