Thx! If the TemplateOptions#networks method is not honored now in Azure (and it makes sense in the provider), mind opening a JIRA for it too? El 4/8/2015 8:49, "Andrea Turli" <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Thanks Ignasi! > > Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981 > > Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can > reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint > in Azure). > > Andrea > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider. > > This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should > > suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create > > VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass > > a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached. > > > > Please, open the corresponding JIRAs. > > > > > > Thx Andrea! > > > > I. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378 > > > > On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Francesco, all, > > > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've > seen > > > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require > > to > > > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute > > to > > > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a > Virtual > > IP > > > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok. > > > > > > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from > > the > > > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ? > > > > > > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed. > > > > > > Thank, > > > Andrea > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Francesco, > > >> > > >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon > > as we > > >> finish with #175 > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Bhathiya > > >> > > >> > > >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone > > >> please > > >> > review? > > >> > > > >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead. > > >> > > > >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out > of > > >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1? > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > > > >> > Regards. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco, > > >> >> > > >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 > are > > >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that > > >> there > > >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and > then > > >> >> promote the provider. > > >> >> > > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi Francesco, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by > > soon. > > >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by > > >> Monday. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Thanks > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > > ilgro...@apache.org > > >> > > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Hi all, > > >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849) > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest > > >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF > > >> >>>> committer > > >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as > > well. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute > > provider > > >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this > provider, > > >> but > > >> >>>> I > > >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago > > >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, > > after > > >> >>>> some > > >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?) > > >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?) > > >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Regards. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> [1] > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> > -- > > >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > >> > > > >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > > >> > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > >> > > > >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > > >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >
