Thanks Ignasi! Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981
Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint in Azure). Andrea On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider. > This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should > suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create > VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass > a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached. > > Please, open the corresponding JIRAs. > > > Thx Andrea! > > I. > > > [1] > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378 > > On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Francesco, all, > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen > > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require > to > > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute > to > > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual > IP > > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok. > > > > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from > the > > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ? > > > > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed. > > > > Thank, > > Andrea > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Francesco, > >> > >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon > as we > >> finish with #175 > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Bhathiya > >> > >> > >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone > >> please > >> > review? > >> > > >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead. > >> > > >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out of > >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1? > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > Regards. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco, > >> >> > >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 are > >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that > >> there > >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and then > >> >> promote the provider. > >> >> > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hsbath...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Francesco, > >> >>> > >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by > soon. > >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by > >> Monday. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks > >> >>> > >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > ilgro...@apache.org > >> > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi all, > >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest > >> >>>> > >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849) > >> >>> > >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest > >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF > >> >>>> committer > >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as > well. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute > provider > >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this provider, > >> but > >> >>>> I > >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago > >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, > after > >> >>>> some > >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?) > >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?) > >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Regards. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> [1] > >> >>>> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> > -- > >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò > >> > > >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > >> > http://www.tirasa.net/ > >> > > >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >> > > >> > > >> >
