[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15558179#comment-15558179
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576:
-------------------------------------

Github user afs commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151
  
    Should we take a step back and reconsider whether updating the current API 
in HttpOp is the right thing to do.
    
    Maybe we ought to
    * introduce a different style more fluid
    * reconsider a design where the caller is responsible for setting up more 
of the `HttpClient` and `HttpOp` provides operations for nothing special (no 
auth) + ops that use a redefined `HttpClient`. This is to reduce method bloat.
    
    On (1): something like (quick sketch)
    
        HttpOp.get("http://example/";)
            .setAccept("application/rdf-xml") // Override default
            .setHttpClientBuilder(....)       // Usually no needed, for special 
setup only
            .exec() ;
    
    where there are implicit builder objects from, `.get(url)`, `.post(url)`, 
`.put(url)`, `'delete(url)`.


> Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.0
>            Reporter: Rob Vesse
>            Assignee: Rob Vesse
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> As of 2.11.0 ARQ centralizes all HTTP operations through HttpOp which relies 
> on Apache HTTP Client.  Currently we are using 4.2.3 while the latest stable 
> release is actually 4.3.1
> Therefore we should look at upgrading our code to use the latest version 
> which may entail some refactoring since there appears to have been some 
> breaking changes across the minor version bump which users have seen in usage 
> - e.g. 
> https://github.com/pyvandenbussche/sparqles/issues/9#issuecomment-27220738



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to