Thanks for the clarification Jose. Makes sense. Ismael
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:22 AM José Armando García Sancio <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > Hi Ismael, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:51 AM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Jose, > > > > Is it a low risk change? If not, I would suggest giving it a bit of > > stabilization time before cherry-picking to older branches including 4.0 > > and 3.9. I don't think it's necessary to backport to other older branches > > given that it's not a regression and I don't believe there are any cases > of > > users running into it. > > We do have users that have encountered this issue in KRaft. I > documented two cases in the Jira. > > Since this is not a regression, I am okay not including this in the > 4.0.0 release. We should include it in the 4.0.1 release. I updated > the Jira so that the fixed version is 4.0.1. > > Thanks, > -- > -José >
