Hi David,

I have done the following tests:

- Built from 4.0.0-rc4 with JDK21-zulu/JDK21-amzn and ran all unit and
integration tests in a container
    - a few tests failed at the first attempt, but failed tests passed
after retried
- Ran all system tests
    - The network_degrade_test and replica_verification_test failed, but
given the conclusion from the RC3 mail thread, I think this is acceptable.
- Ran the KRaft quickstart using kafka_2.13-4.0.0.tgz
- Built JVM and native images with rc4 archive and tested JVM and native
containers by following the Multiple Nodes example from Docker Hub
- Test dynamic quorum using kafka_2.13-4.0.0.tgz and kafka_2.13-3.9.0.tgz
with the following matrix:
    - 4.0 controller / 4.0 broker
    - 4.0 controller as leader / 4.0 controller and 3.9 controller as voter
/ 4.0 broker and 3.9 broker as follower
    - 3.9 controller as leader / 4.0 controller and 3.9 controller as voter
/ 4.0 broker and 3.9 broker as follower
    - also create some topics


+1 (non-binding)

Best Regards,
TengYao

Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> 於 2025年3月15日 週六 上午2:38寫道:

> Hello again folks,
>
> I chatted with Jose offline about this issue and he explained we need to
> remove the --standalone flag to get kraft.version=0. I filed a ticket for
> this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18987
>
> I was able to run the tests I wanted and I found when I use the upgrade
> --release version flag, we are still saying we are upgrading kraft.version
> to 1 even though we do not. I don't think this is necessarily a blocker,
> but wanted to call it out.
>
> bin/kafka-features.sh --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 upgrade
> --release-version 4.0 group.version was upgraded to 1. kraft.version was
> upgraded to 1. metadata.version was upgraded to 25. transaction.version was
> upgraded to 2. bin/kafka-features.sh --bootstrap-server localhost:9092
> describe Feature: eligible.leader.replicas.version SupportedMinVersion: 0
> SupportedMaxVersion: 1 FinalizedVersionLevel: 0 Epoch: 189 Feature:
> group.version SupportedMinVersion: 0 SupportedMaxVersion: 1
> FinalizedVersionLevel: 1 Epoch: 189 Feature: kraft.version
> SupportedMinVersion: 0 SupportedMaxVersion: 1 FinalizedVersionLevel: 0
> Epoch: 189 Feature: metadata.version SupportedMinVersion: 3.3-IV3
> SupportedMaxVersion: 4.0-IV3 FinalizedVersionLevel: 4.0-IV3 Epoch: 189
> Feature: transaction.version SupportedMinVersion: 0 SupportedMaxVersion: 2
> FinalizedVersionLevel: 2 Epoch: 189 I ran the remaining validations I had
> (running transactions bench, verifying expected behavior). In addition, I
> also verified the signatures, browsed the docs, looked at the tests and
> release artifacts. +1 (binding) from me with a strong recommendation to
> update some of the docs around KIP-853. Thanks,
> Justine
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:46 AM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Thanks for this next release candidate.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but I was trying to test out some of the
> > changes that Jose provided, by configuring a static quorum
> > (kraft.version=0) and I seem to be unable to do so.
> > I set controller.quorum.voters=1@localhost:9093 as per how it looked in
> > 3.9 (with no controller.quorum.bootstrap.servers, but no matter what I do
> > it says "Cannot set kraft.version to 0 if KIP-853 configuration is
> > present. Try removing the --feature flag for kraft.version."
> >
> > Can someone help me out here? The documentation says:
> > > The static versus dynamic nature of the quorum is determined at the
> > time of formatting. Specifically, the quorum will be formatted as dynamic
> > if controller.quorum.voters is *not* present, and if the software version
> > is Apache Kafka 3.9 or newer. If you have followed the instructions
> earlier
> > in this document, you will get a dynamic quorum.
> >
> > But this seems incorrect. I'm hoping I'm just misunderstanding the
> > documentation and not that there is another issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Justine
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:22 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I verified the latest RC with the following steps:
> >>
> >>    - Verified the signatures
> >>    - Built from source
> >>    - Ran the unit tests (same single failure from before, but otherwise
> >> all
> >>    good)
> >>    - Executed the quickstart against the built source code.
> >>    - Ran the streams quickstart.
> >>    - Tested the apache/kafka and apache/kafka-native docker images with
> >> the
> >>    quickstart
> >>    - Spot checked the javadoc and documentation.
> >>
> >> +1(binding)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:36 AM Lianet M. <liane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi David, I verified the new RC with the following steps:
> >> >
> >> > - Checked system tests run: there were 2 new failures in connect that
> we
> >> > didn't have in the previous RC (test_broker_compatibility and
> >> > test_pause_state_persistent). I ran them locally and they both pass
> (so
> >> > based on this and the error msg seems like just flakiness)
> >> > - Build from src with java 17, followed the quickstart and played with
> >> > consume/produce & topic management with the command line tools
> >> > - Run client examples from the examples module (java 17)
> >> > - Tested consuming in groups with both classic and new consumer
> protocol
> >> > - Tested the consumer group online migration & the command line new
> >> tools
> >> > to visualize/track the live migration
> >> > - Build clients with java 11 , run unit and integration tests.
> >> > - Run client examples from the examples module (java 11)
> >> >
> >> > +1 (non-binding)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > Lianet
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:28 AM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > David, thanks for running this behemoth of a release.
> >> > >
> >> > > With the help of my coworker Mahsa Seifikar, we have verified the
> >> > following
> >> > > upgrade scenario:
> >> > >
> >> > > * Provision a ZK based Kafka cluster on 3.5 and create some topics
> >> > > * Upgrade to 3.9
> >> > > * Migrate to KRaft
> >> > > * Upgrade to 4.0
> >> > >
> >> > > We found a few docs issues which have since been fixed. One minor
> 3.9
> >> > docs
> >> > > issue is still pending, but that's not a blocker.
> >> > >
> >> > > I also ran through the quickstart.
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 binding
> >> > >
> >> > > -David A
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 7:57 AM Federico Valeri <
> fedeval...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi David, I've tested the RC4 and this is what I've done:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Used the binaries to create a cluster and run clients from
> >> exampled
> >> > > > module
> >> > > > - Tested the upgrade issue we found in KAFKA-18979
> >> > > > - Tested the dynamic quorum feature (both scale up and down)
> >> > > > - Tested group.protocol=consumer with a simple Java app
> >> > > > - Browsed the documentation and javadoc
> >> > > > - Tested the Docker images
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +1 non binding
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks for running the release.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers
> >> > > > Fede
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:11 AM David Jacot <da...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > This is the fourth candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.0.0.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - This is the first release without Apache Zookeeper
> >> > > > > - The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol is
> >> Generally
> >> > > > Available
> >> > > > > - The Transactions Server-Side Defense (Phase 2) is Generally
> >> > Available
> >> > > > > - Queues for Kafka is in Early Access
> >> > > > > - Kafka uses log4j2
> >> > > > > - Drop broker and tools support for Java 11
> >> > > > > - Remove old client protocol API versions
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Release notes for the 4.0.0 release:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by Monday, March 17, 9am PT.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> >> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Docker release artifacts to be voted upon:
> >> > > > > apache/kafka:4.0.0-rc4
> >> > > > > apache/kafka-native:4.0.0-rc4
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> >> > > > >
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Javadoc:
> >> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/javadoc/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 4.0 branch) is the 4.0.0 tag:
> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/4.0.0-rc4
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Documentation:
> >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/40/documentation.html
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Protocol:
> >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/40/protocol.html
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Successful CI builds for the 4.0 branch:
> >> > > > > Unit/integration tests:
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13846870683
> >> > > > > System tests:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2025-03-13--001.6a14e68a-4791-44eb-a6be-24ce25bc1678--1741882266--apache--4.0--8f765a1886/report.html
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > * Successful Docker Image Github Actions Pipeline for 4.0
> branch:
> >> > > > > Docker Build Test Pipeline (JVM):
> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13852844456
> >> > > > > Docker Build Test Pipeline (Native):
> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13853116713
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > /**************************************
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > David Jacot
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > David Arthur
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to