Hi David,

For the system tests:
> System tests:
https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2025-03-13--001.6a14e68a-4791-44eb-a6be-24ce25bc1678--1741882266--apache--4.0--8f765a1886/report.html

This page is blank in my browser. Is that only me seeing this?

Thanks.
Luke

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 4:09 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> From @Jusine
> > I was able to run the tests I wanted and I found when I use the upgrade
> --release version flag, we are still saying we are upgrading kraft.version
> to 1 even though we do not. I don't think this is necessarily a blocker,
> but wanted to call it out.
>
> I've opened KAFKA-18992
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18992> to track it. And +1
> for not a blocker.
>
> I've done:
>
> - Browsed the javadoc and protocol and documentation
> - Ran the quickstart
> - Verified that KIP-853 feature
> - Verified tiered storage feature
>
> I also opened KAFKA-18993
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18993> to improve the
> document, but again, not a blocker.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for running the release!
> Luke
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM TengYao Chi <kiting...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I have done the following tests:
>>
>> - Built from 4.0.0-rc4 with JDK21-zulu/JDK21-amzn and ran all unit and
>> integration tests in a container
>>     - a few tests failed at the first attempt, but failed tests passed
>> after retried
>> - Ran all system tests
>>     - The network_degrade_test and replica_verification_test failed, but
>> given the conclusion from the RC3 mail thread, I think this is acceptable.
>> - Ran the KRaft quickstart using kafka_2.13-4.0.0.tgz
>> - Built JVM and native images with rc4 archive and tested JVM and native
>> containers by following the Multiple Nodes example from Docker Hub
>> - Test dynamic quorum using kafka_2.13-4.0.0.tgz and kafka_2.13-3.9.0.tgz
>> with the following matrix:
>>     - 4.0 controller / 4.0 broker
>>     - 4.0 controller as leader / 4.0 controller and 3.9 controller as
>> voter
>> / 4.0 broker and 3.9 broker as follower
>>     - 3.9 controller as leader / 4.0 controller and 3.9 controller as
>> voter
>> / 4.0 broker and 3.9 broker as follower
>>     - also create some topics
>>
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> TengYao
>>
>> Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> 於 2025年3月15日 週六 上午2:38寫道:
>>
>> > Hello again folks,
>> >
>> > I chatted with Jose offline about this issue and he explained we need to
>> > remove the --standalone flag to get kraft.version=0. I filed a ticket
>> for
>> > this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18987
>> >
>> > I was able to run the tests I wanted and I found when I use the upgrade
>> > --release version flag, we are still saying we are upgrading
>> kraft.version
>> > to 1 even though we do not. I don't think this is necessarily a blocker,
>> > but wanted to call it out.
>> >
>> > bin/kafka-features.sh --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 upgrade
>> > --release-version 4.0 group.version was upgraded to 1. kraft.version was
>> > upgraded to 1. metadata.version was upgraded to 25. transaction.version
>> was
>> > upgraded to 2. bin/kafka-features.sh --bootstrap-server localhost:9092
>> > describe Feature: eligible.leader.replicas.version SupportedMinVersion:
>> 0
>> > SupportedMaxVersion: 1 FinalizedVersionLevel: 0 Epoch: 189 Feature:
>> > group.version SupportedMinVersion: 0 SupportedMaxVersion: 1
>> > FinalizedVersionLevel: 1 Epoch: 189 Feature: kraft.version
>> > SupportedMinVersion: 0 SupportedMaxVersion: 1 FinalizedVersionLevel: 0
>> > Epoch: 189 Feature: metadata.version SupportedMinVersion: 3.3-IV3
>> > SupportedMaxVersion: 4.0-IV3 FinalizedVersionLevel: 4.0-IV3 Epoch: 189
>> > Feature: transaction.version SupportedMinVersion: 0
>> SupportedMaxVersion: 2
>> > FinalizedVersionLevel: 2 Epoch: 189 I ran the remaining validations I
>> had
>> > (running transactions bench, verifying expected behavior). In addition,
>> I
>> > also verified the signatures, browsed the docs, looked at the tests and
>> > release artifacts. +1 (binding) from me with a strong recommendation to
>> > update some of the docs around KIP-853. Thanks,
>> > Justine
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:46 AM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi David,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for this next release candidate.
>> > >
>> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I was trying to test out some of the
>> > > changes that Jose provided, by configuring a static quorum
>> > > (kraft.version=0) and I seem to be unable to do so.
>> > > I set controller.quorum.voters=1@localhost:9093 as per how it looked
>> in
>> > > 3.9 (with no controller.quorum.bootstrap.servers, but no matter what
>> I do
>> > > it says "Cannot set kraft.version to 0 if KIP-853 configuration is
>> > > present. Try removing the --feature flag for kraft.version."
>> > >
>> > > Can someone help me out here? The documentation says:
>> > > > The static versus dynamic nature of the quorum is determined at the
>> > > time of formatting. Specifically, the quorum will be formatted as
>> dynamic
>> > > if controller.quorum.voters is *not* present, and if the software
>> version
>> > > is Apache Kafka 3.9 or newer. If you have followed the instructions
>> > earlier
>> > > in this document, you will get a dynamic quorum.
>> > >
>> > > But this seems incorrect. I'm hoping I'm just misunderstanding the
>> > > documentation and not that there is another issue.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Justine
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:22 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi David,
>> > >>
>> > >> I verified the latest RC with the following steps:
>> > >>
>> > >>    - Verified the signatures
>> > >>    - Built from source
>> > >>    - Ran the unit tests (same single failure from before, but
>> otherwise
>> > >> all
>> > >>    good)
>> > >>    - Executed the quickstart against the built source code.
>> > >>    - Ran the streams quickstart.
>> > >>    - Tested the apache/kafka and apache/kafka-native docker images
>> with
>> > >> the
>> > >>    quickstart
>> > >>    - Spot checked the javadoc and documentation.
>> > >>
>> > >> +1(binding)
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Bill
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:36 AM Lianet M. <liane...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Hi David, I verified the new RC with the following steps:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > - Checked system tests run: there were 2 new failures in connect
>> that
>> > we
>> > >> > didn't have in the previous RC (test_broker_compatibility and
>> > >> > test_pause_state_persistent). I ran them locally and they both pass
>> > (so
>> > >> > based on this and the error msg seems like just flakiness)
>> > >> > - Build from src with java 17, followed the quickstart and played
>> with
>> > >> > consume/produce & topic management with the command line tools
>> > >> > - Run client examples from the examples module (java 17)
>> > >> > - Tested consuming in groups with both classic and new consumer
>> > protocol
>> > >> > - Tested the consumer group online migration & the command line new
>> > >> tools
>> > >> > to visualize/track the live migration
>> > >> > - Build clients with java 11 , run unit and integration tests.
>> > >> > - Run client examples from the examples module (java 11)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks!
>> > >> > Lianet
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:28 AM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > David, thanks for running this behemoth of a release.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > With the help of my coworker Mahsa Seifikar, we have verified the
>> > >> > following
>> > >> > > upgrade scenario:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > * Provision a ZK based Kafka cluster on 3.5 and create some
>> topics
>> > >> > > * Upgrade to 3.9
>> > >> > > * Migrate to KRaft
>> > >> > > * Upgrade to 4.0
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > We found a few docs issues which have since been fixed. One minor
>> > 3.9
>> > >> > docs
>> > >> > > issue is still pending, but that's not a blocker.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I also ran through the quickstart.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > +1 binding
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > -David A
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 7:57 AM Federico Valeri <
>> > fedeval...@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Hi David, I've tested the RC4 and this is what I've done:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > - Used the binaries to create a cluster and run clients from
>> > >> exampled
>> > >> > > > module
>> > >> > > > - Tested the upgrade issue we found in KAFKA-18979
>> > >> > > > - Tested the dynamic quorum feature (both scale up and down)
>> > >> > > > - Tested group.protocol=consumer with a simple Java app
>> > >> > > > - Browsed the documentation and javadoc
>> > >> > > > - Tested the Docker images
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > +1 non binding
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Thanks for running the release.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Cheers
>> > >> > > > Fede
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:11 AM David Jacot <da...@apache.org
>> >
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > This is the fourth candidate for release of Apache Kafka
>> 4.0.0.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > - This is the first release without Apache Zookeeper
>> > >> > > > > - The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol is
>> > >> Generally
>> > >> > > > Available
>> > >> > > > > - The Transactions Server-Side Defense (Phase 2) is Generally
>> > >> > Available
>> > >> > > > > - Queues for Kafka is in Early Access
>> > >> > > > > - Kafka uses log4j2
>> > >> > > > > - Drop broker and tools support for Java 11
>> > >> > > > > - Remove old client protocol API versions
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Release notes for the 4.0.0 release:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by Monday, March 17, 9am
>> PT.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> > release:
>> > >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
>> > >> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Docker release artifacts to be voted upon:
>> > >> > > > > apache/kafka:4.0.0-rc4
>> > >> > > > > apache/kafka-native:4.0.0-rc4
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Javadoc:
>> > >> > > > >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.0.0-rc4/javadoc/
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 4.0 branch) is the 4.0.0 tag:
>> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/4.0.0-rc4
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Documentation:
>> > >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/40/documentation.html
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Protocol:
>> > >> > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/40/protocol.html
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Successful CI builds for the 4.0 branch:
>> > >> > > > > Unit/integration tests:
>> > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13846870683
>> > >> > > > > System tests:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2025-03-13--001.6a14e68a-4791-44eb-a6be-24ce25bc1678--1741882266--apache--4.0--8f765a1886/report.html
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > * Successful Docker Image Github Actions Pipeline for 4.0
>> > branch:
>> > >> > > > > Docker Build Test Pipeline (JVM):
>> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13852844456
>> > >> > > > > Docker Build Test Pipeline (Native):
>> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13853116713
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > /**************************************
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks,
>> > >> > > > > David Jacot
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > --
>> > >> > > David Arthur
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to