I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14) and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best, to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14. Thanks for your contributions! -Matthias On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote: > Hi, > When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for > this > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-14+-+Tools+Standardization > > > Thanks, > Bharat > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Ewen, Matthias, >> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as part >> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Bharat >> >> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported >>> parameters over all tools would be great! >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this: >>>>> >>>>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should >>>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all >>> tools so >>>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP... >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing >>> some >>>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically >>>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a >>> consumer.config >>>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for >>> other >>>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are >>>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward >>> for >>>>> future tools. >>>>> >>>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on >>> the >>>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be >>> more >>>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now... >>>>> >>>>> -Ewen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eno >>>>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would >>> like >>>>> to >>>>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to >>>>>>> streams reset tool >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ >>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool >>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ >>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bharat >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
