Hi Matthias, I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be needed for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this is minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as without this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in a secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it needs to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
Thanks, Bharat On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14) > and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm. > > Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best, > to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14. > > Thanks for your contributions! > > > -Matthias > > > On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote: > > Hi, > > When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for > > this > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 14+-+Tools+Standardization > > > > > > Thanks, > > Bharat > > > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Ewen, Matthias, > >> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as > part > >> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Bharat > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported > >>> parameters over all tools would be great! > >>> > >>> > >>> -Matthias > >>> > >>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>> > >>>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this: > >>>>> > >>>>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should > >>>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all > >>> tools so > >>>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP... > >>>>> > >>>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing > >>> some > >>>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions > automatically > >>>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a > >>> consumer.config > >>>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for > >>> other > >>>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that > are > >>>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward > >>> for > >>>>> future tools. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started > on > >>> the > >>>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be > >>> more > >>>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now... > >>>>> > >>>>> -Ewen > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska < > eno.there...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Eno > >>>>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would > >>> like > >>>>> to > >>>>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options > to > >>>>>>> streams reset tool > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > >>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool > >>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > >>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>* > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bharat > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >
