KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline is strict.
-Matthias On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote: > Hi Matthias, > I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all > tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be needed > for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this is > minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as without > this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in a > secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it needs > to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14. > > Thanks, > Bharat > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14) >> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm. >> >> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best, >> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14. >> >> Thanks for your contributions! >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for >>> this >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >> 14+-+Tools+Standardization >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bharat >>> >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ewen, Matthias, >>>> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as >> part >>>> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Bharat >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported >>>>> parameters over all tools would be great! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should >>>>>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all >>>>> tools so >>>>>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing >>>>> some >>>>>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions >> automatically >>>>>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a >>>>> consumer.config >>>>>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for >>>>> other >>>>>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that >> are >>>>>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward >>>>> for >>>>>>> future tools. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started >> on >>>>> the >>>>>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be >>>>> more >>>>>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Ewen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska < >> eno.there...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eno >>>>>>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would >>>>> like >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options >> to >>>>>>>>> streams reset tool >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ >>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool >>>>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ >>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bharat >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
