Couple of follow ups.

The reset tool uses AdminClient, ZkUtils, and a KafkaConsumer
internally. Thus, I am wondering if we need the possibility to specify
configs for all of them?

The original JIRA reported, that the reset tool does not work for a
secured cluster, and thus, I doubt that consumer properties are
sufficient for resolve this.

Maybe some people that are more familiar with Kafka security can help
out here. I personally have only limited knowledge about this topic.


-Matthias



On 5/19/17 11:09 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Matthias.
> 
> Regards,
> Bharat
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> 
>> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
>> is strict.
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across
>> all
>>> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
>> needed
>>> for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this
>> is
>>> minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as
>> without
>>> this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in
>> a
>>> secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it
>> needs
>>> to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bharat
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
>>>> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
>>>>
>>>> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
>>>> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your contributions!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP
>> for
>>>>> this
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>>> 14+-+Tools+Standardization
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Bharat
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
>>>>>> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as
>>>> part
>>>>>> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Bharat
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
>> matth...@confluent.io
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
>>>>>>> parameters over all tools would be great!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
>> e...@confluent.io
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
>>>>>>>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
>>>>>>> tools so
>>>>>>>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions
>>>> automatically
>>>>>>>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
>>>>>>> consumer.config
>>>>>>>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that
>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path
>> forward
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> future tools.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started
>>>> on
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to
>> be
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Ewen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
>>>> eno.there...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Eno
>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> streams reset tool
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>>>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>>>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bharat
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to