We probably need to setup a roadmap page for Karaf where we can indicate major changes such as JVM support.
Is this something we should tackle now or as part of the site updates? On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 :) > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:16AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote: >> Sounds good :) >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we >> > don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik, >> > we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine). >> > I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go. >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the >> >> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be >> >> fixed. >> >> I'll investigate on monday too. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by >> >>>> > now. Things >> >>>> > missing: >> >>>> > >> >>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release >> >>>> > fails for me; >> >>>> > gnodet can you do this please?) >> >>>> >> >>>> I'll do that on monday. >> >>> >> >>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts >> >>> are not >> >>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :) >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT >> >>>> >> >>>> Which one is that? >> >>> >> >>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day >> >>>> > >> >>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date >> >>>> > for 2.1 (when >> >>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :)) >> >>>> > >> >>>> > WDYT? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > kind regards, >> >>>> > andreas >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote: >> >>>> >> Hey guys, >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and >> >>>> >> also >> >>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened >> >>>> >> (with already >> >>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and >> >>>> >> add one or >> >>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you >> >>>> >> want to >> >>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> WDYT? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> kind regards, >> >>>> >> andreas >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Guillaume Nodet >> >>>> ------------------------ >> >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >>>> ------------------------ >> >>>> Open Source SOA >> >>>> http://fusesource.com >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> ------------------------ >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> ------------------------ >> >> Open Source SOA >> >> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > Guillaume Nodet >> > ------------------------ >> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> > ------------------------ >> > Open Source SOA >> > http://fusesource.com >> > >
