Sorry cross post of the JVM discussion to the 2.1.3 release thread.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: > We probably need to setup a roadmap page for Karaf where we can > indicate major changes such as JVM support. > > Is this something we should tackle now or as part of the site updates? > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 :) >> >> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:16AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote: >>> Sounds good :) >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we >>> > don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik, >>> > we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine). >>> > I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go. >>> > >>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the >>> >> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be >>> >> fixed. >>> >> I'll investigate on monday too. >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by >>> >>>> > now. Things >>> >>>> > missing: >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release >>> >>>> > fails for me; >>> >>>> > gnodet can you do this please?) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'll do that on monday. >>> >>> >>> >>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts >>> >>> are not >>> >>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :) >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Which one is that? >>> >>> >>> >>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date >>> >>>> > for 2.1 (when >>> >>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :)) >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > WDYT? >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > kind regards, >>> >>>> > andreas >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>> >>>> >> Hey guys, >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and >>> >>>> >> also >>> >>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened >>> >>>> >> (with already >>> >>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and >>> >>>> >> add one or >>> >>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you >>> >>>> >> want to >>> >>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3? >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> WDYT? >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> kind regards, >>> >>>> >> andreas >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>>> Guillaume Nodet >>> >>>> ------------------------ >>> >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> >>>> ------------------------ >>> >>>> Open Source SOA >>> >>>> http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Guillaume Nodet >>> >> ------------------------ >>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> >> ------------------------ >>> >> Open Source SOA >>> >> http://fusesource.com >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Cheers, >>> > Guillaume Nodet >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Open Source SOA >>> > http://fusesource.com >>> > >> >
