Hi Lukasz, I'm also with JB so as a optional feature for 3.x
and a +1 for the alpha release +1 for looking for interested parties. even though the Karaf space may not be the best place for those additions I really would like to see those beeing available at least as "showcases" regards, Achim 2012/8/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > Hi Lukasz, > > we discussed about WebConsole during the 2nd Karaf Birthday call. > > I propose to include it asap on trunk to be able to include it in Karaf > 3.0.0, or at least in 3.1.0. > > Regarding the vote: > > +1 to release an alpha immediately and include it on trunk (it could be an > "optional" feature, having both webconsole (old style) and new webconsole > available) > > +0 for the other communities announcement. I'm agree but my concerning is > more about timing. Before announcing and promoting WebConsole, I would first > release a version which allow us to perform tests on it and be sure we are > OK. > > Regards > JB > > > On 08/10/2012 02:51 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> Last year Andreas, Charles and I started working on Karaf WebConsole. >> Since then lots of things was done - almost complete support for OSGi >> management, switching to Wicket 1.5. Some of things still need to be done - >> complete Karaf modules, clean up or improve Config Admin / Events / Log / >> Blueprint pages. Branch for Karaf 3.0 (easy stuff). After that we should be >> ready to release stable version. Even now we can release early alpha to let >> 2.x users test webconsole and get involved in community. >> >> Outside core modules we have integrations with Camel / CXF and ServiceMix. >> These modules are not supported and was done by me as proof of concepts. For >> now there is no one who is interested in it. We should consider to announce >> existence of these modules or even Karaf WebConsole to other communities to >> get them involved in development. If we won't do that we may remove these >> modules as they will be not supported. >> >> Please take a vote in following two topics: >> >> Should WebConsole be early released: >> +1: Yes we should release alpha immediately >> 0: We should clean up code shortly and release >> -1: Wait untill getting stable codebase >> >> Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other communities: >> +1: Yes, we need to look for interested parties >> -1: No, we don't need them now, remove it >> >> I hope that vote will be also good occassion to discuss about WebConsole. >> >> Kind regards, >> Lukasz >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
