+1 for the alpha release +1 for looking for interested parties.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote: > For Karaf 3.x > > +1 for the alpha release > > +1 for looking for interested parties. > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Achim Nierbeck > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> I'm also with JB so as a optional feature for 3.x >> >> and a >> >> +1 for the alpha release >> >> +1 for looking for interested parties. >> >> even though the Karaf space may not be the best place for those >> additions I really would like to see those beeing available at least >> as "showcases" >> >> regards, Achim >> >> 2012/8/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: >> > Hi Lukasz, >> > >> > we discussed about WebConsole during the 2nd Karaf Birthday call. >> > >> > I propose to include it asap on trunk to be able to include it in Karaf >> > 3.0.0, or at least in 3.1.0. >> > >> > Regarding the vote: >> > >> > +1 to release an alpha immediately and include it on trunk (it could be >> an >> > "optional" feature, having both webconsole (old style) and new webconsole >> > available) >> > >> > +0 for the other communities announcement. I'm agree but my concerning is >> > more about timing. Before announcing and promoting WebConsole, I would >> first >> > release a version which allow us to perform tests on it and be sure we >> are >> > OK. >> > >> > Regards >> > JB >> > >> > >> > On 08/10/2012 02:51 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Last year Andreas, Charles and I started working on Karaf WebConsole. >> >> Since then lots of things was done - almost complete support for OSGi >> >> management, switching to Wicket 1.5. Some of things still need to be >> done - >> >> complete Karaf modules, clean up or improve Config Admin / Events / Log >> / >> >> Blueprint pages. Branch for Karaf 3.0 (easy stuff). After that we >> should be >> >> ready to release stable version. Even now we can release early alpha to >> let >> >> 2.x users test webconsole and get involved in community. >> >> >> >> Outside core modules we have integrations with Camel / CXF and >> ServiceMix. >> >> These modules are not supported and was done by me as proof of >> concepts. For >> >> now there is no one who is interested in it. We should consider to >> announce >> >> existence of these modules or even Karaf WebConsole to other >> communities to >> >> get them involved in development. If we won't do that we may remove >> these >> >> modules as they will be not supported. >> >> >> >> Please take a vote in following two topics: >> >> >> >> Should WebConsole be early released: >> >> +1: Yes we should release alpha immediately >> >> 0: We should clean up code shortly and release >> >> -1: Wait untill getting stable codebase >> >> >> >> Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other >> communities: >> >> +1: Yes, we need to look for interested parties >> >> -1: No, we don't need them now, remove it >> >> >> >> I hope that vote will be also good occassion to discuss about >> WebConsole. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Lukasz >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> > [email protected] >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >> Committer & Project Lead >> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin >> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project >> Lead >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com > Twitter : @cmoulliard > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
