Should WebConsole be early released: 0 I propose to include it in the trunk now and release it with Karaf 3. So it could be included in the RC1 already. I would rather not do a separate Release as it may confuse users.
Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other communities: 1 I think we should at least write on the respective dev lists that the modules are there. So if they pick them up its great if not I would delete them. Christian Am 10.08.2012 14:51, schrieb Łukasz Dywicki:
Dear all, Last year Andreas, Charles and I started working on Karaf WebConsole. Since then lots of things was done - almost complete support for OSGi management, switching to Wicket 1.5. Some of things still need to be done - complete Karaf modules, clean up or improve Config Admin / Events / Log / Blueprint pages. Branch for Karaf 3.0 (easy stuff). After that we should be ready to release stable version. Even now we can release early alpha to let 2.x users test webconsole and get involved in community. Outside core modules we have integrations with Camel / CXF and ServiceMix. These modules are not supported and was done by me as proof of concepts. For now there is no one who is interested in it. We should consider to announce existence of these modules or even Karaf WebConsole to other communities to get them involved in development. If we won't do that we may remove these modules as they will be not supported. Please take a vote in following two topics: Should WebConsole be early released: +1: Yes we should release alpha immediately 0: We should clean up code shortly and release -1: Wait untill getting stable codebase Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other communities: +1: Yes, we need to look for interested parties -1: No, we don't need them now, remove it I hope that vote will be also good occassion to discuss about WebConsole. Kind regards, Lukasz
-- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
