Hi Tibor, Honestly I don't think we should make the effort to publish our extensions there (either quarkus or spring boot). This will tie us to their lifecycle and that could be overkilling right now for us, as we are moving towards GA. When the project is more mature I think there might be room to do it, but right now I don't think we should be part of those platforms.,
El mié, 7 ago 2024 a las 11:12, Tibor Zimányi (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > Hi Toshiya, > > thank you for opening this thread. I personally think, we should be part of > Quarkus platform. However I think the question should be broader. Majority > in the industry use Spring, so I think we should resolve this discussion on > a broader scale. I think Spring (and Spring Boot) should be a first class > citizen too in our code the same way Quarkus is. So I think the discussion > should be about if we want KIE be part of both Quarkus platform and > start.spring.io. > > Best regards, > Tibor > > Dňa st 7. 8. 2024, 11:06 Toshiya Kobayashi <[email protected]> > napísal(a): > > > Hi > > > > Jan raised a concern > > > > > I'd check one thing here with the mailing list - if we still want to > > perform any steps towards being part of that platform. I mean, fixing > > pipelines is a good thing here, but I am not sure if we actually want to > > make it work. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/pull/1229#issuecomment-2268789394 > > > > It means "Do we want to keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform?" and if > > the quarkus platform jobs should even exist. > > > > Does anyone have thoughts on this? > > > > Regards, > > Toshiya > > -- Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
