Quarkus is a fast paced environment, we still struggle to release 10;

Once we have a regular consistent release schedule we can better evaluate.

+1 big time to raise SB3 as first class citizen before considering Quarkus
platform.



On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:34 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Although it has not been our policy so far, from a community perspective I
> fully agree with Enrique, for the same reasons he argued.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:21 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tibor,
> > Honestly I don't think we should make the effort to publish our
> > extensions there (either quarkus or spring boot). This will tie us to
> > their lifecycle and that could be overkilling right now for us, as we
> > are moving towards GA. When the project is more mature I think there
> > might be room to do it, but right now I don't think we should be part
> > of those platforms.,
> >
> > El mié, 7 ago 2024 a las 11:12, Tibor Zimányi (<[email protected]>)
> > escribió:
> > >
> > > Hi Toshiya,
> > >
> > > thank you for opening this thread. I personally think, we should be
> part
> > of
> > > Quarkus platform. However I think the question should be broader.
> > Majority
> > > in the industry use Spring, so I think we should resolve this
> discussion
> > on
> > > a broader scale. I think Spring (and Spring Boot) should be a first
> class
> > > citizen too in our code the same way Quarkus is. So I think the
> > discussion
> > > should be about if we want KIE be part of both Quarkus platform and
> > > start.spring.io.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tibor
> > >
> > > Dňa st 7. 8. 2024, 11:06 Toshiya Kobayashi <[email protected]
> >
> > > napísal(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Jan raised a concern
> > > >
> > > > > I'd check one thing here with the mailing list - if we still want
> to
> > > > perform any steps towards being part of that platform. I mean, fixing
> > > > pipelines is a good thing here, but I am not sure if we actually want
> > to
> > > > make it work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/pull/1229#issuecomment-2268789394
> > > >
> > > > It means "Do we want to keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform?"
> > and if
> > > > the quarkus platform jobs should even exist.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have thoughts on this?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Toshiya
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to