btw, this is also a conversation for post graduation makes no sense considered this while in incubation
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 7:23 AM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Quarkus is a fast paced environment, we still struggle to release 10; > > Once we have a regular consistent release schedule we can better evaluate. > > +1 big time to raise SB3 as first class citizen before considering Quarkus > platform. > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:34 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Although it has not been our policy so far, from a community perspective I >> fully agree with Enrique, for the same reasons he argued. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:21 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Tibor, >> > Honestly I don't think we should make the effort to publish our >> > extensions there (either quarkus or spring boot). This will tie us to >> > their lifecycle and that could be overkilling right now for us, as we >> > are moving towards GA. When the project is more mature I think there >> > might be room to do it, but right now I don't think we should be part >> > of those platforms., >> > >> > El mié, 7 ago 2024 a las 11:12, Tibor Zimányi (<[email protected]>) >> > escribió: >> > > >> > > Hi Toshiya, >> > > >> > > thank you for opening this thread. I personally think, we should be >> part >> > of >> > > Quarkus platform. However I think the question should be broader. >> > Majority >> > > in the industry use Spring, so I think we should resolve this >> discussion >> > on >> > > a broader scale. I think Spring (and Spring Boot) should be a first >> class >> > > citizen too in our code the same way Quarkus is. So I think the >> > discussion >> > > should be about if we want KIE be part of both Quarkus platform and >> > > start.spring.io. >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Tibor >> > > >> > > Dňa st 7. 8. 2024, 11:06 Toshiya Kobayashi < >> [email protected]> >> > > napísal(a): >> > > >> > > > Hi >> > > > >> > > > Jan raised a concern >> > > > >> > > > > I'd check one thing here with the mailing list - if we still want >> to >> > > > perform any steps towards being part of that platform. I mean, >> fixing >> > > > pipelines is a good thing here, but I am not sure if we actually >> want >> > to >> > > > make it work. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/pull/1229#issuecomment-2268789394 >> > > > >> > > > It means "Do we want to keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform?" >> > and if >> > > > the quarkus platform jobs should even exist. >> > > > >> > > > Does anyone have thoughts on this? >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Toshiya >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :) >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >
