[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15474339#comment-15474339
]
Larry McCay commented on KNOX-732:
----------------------------------
While this may address the size difference between proxying through Knox and
going direct, it more than likely makes it impossible to rewrite the content of
the JS. If there are embedded URLs within the JS it would need to be rewritten
to go through Knox rather than to the original URL.
Unfortunately, I believe that we need to use an implementation that
recompresses the content rather than not ever decompressing it.
> Knox does not recompress javascript resources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-732
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Reporter: Sumit Gupta
> Assignee: Sandeep More
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-732.001.patch
>
>
> When using the Ambari UI proxy service it is observed that the app.js file is
> about 7MB whereas it is much smaller (about 1MB) when the UI is not proxied
> by Knox.
> A compression solution needs to be investigated. Possibly by adding a gzip
> compression handler or filter to jetty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
