[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15477911#comment-15477911
]
Sandeep More commented on KNOX-732:
-----------------------------------
My initial thought was to bite the bullet and upgrade Jetty but now I see your
point with the backport and given the refactoring involved I think Gzip Filter
would be a better way forward !
> Knox does not recompress javascript resources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-732
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Reporter: Sumit Gupta
> Assignee: Sandeep More
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-732.001.patch
>
>
> When using the Ambari UI proxy service it is observed that the app.js file is
> about 7MB whereas it is much smaller (about 1MB) when the UI is not proxied
> by Knox.
> A compression solution needs to be investigated. Possibly by adding a gzip
> compression handler or filter to jetty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
