[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15477888#comment-15477888
]
Larry McCay commented on KNOX-732:
----------------------------------
Hi [~smore] - thanks for the research on this!
I am leaning toward using the Gzip Filter since it will be easier to backport
to the 0.9.x line should someone consider the current behavior a bug.
Backporting a server version upgrade is a bit more risky.
Once we upgrade jetty we can replace the filter with the handler if there is
reason enough to do so.
Thoughts?
> Knox does not recompress javascript resources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-732
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-732
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Reporter: Sumit Gupta
> Assignee: Sandeep More
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-732.001.patch
>
>
> When using the Ambari UI proxy service it is observed that the app.js file is
> about 7MB whereas it is much smaller (about 1MB) when the UI is not proxied
> by Knox.
> A compression solution needs to be investigated. Possibly by adding a gzip
> compression handler or filter to jetty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
