Hey Todd, Thanks. Yep, start a VOTE thread once:
1. We post a draft resolution to this DISCUSS thread. Leave the resolution up for a least a day or two before the VOTE thread. If no objections, or updates, or when finalized, move to VOTE thread first here on dev@kudu. Leave VOTE thread open for a week, no rush. Include resolution in VOTE thread. 2. Once and if affirmative VOTE on dev@kudu, then start [email protected] VOTE thread, posting links to VOTE and DISCUSS threads on kudu and summarizing tally so far, indicating VOTEs from IPMC and mentors. Leave that thread up for a week too. Include resolution in VOTE thread. 3. If affirmative there, then take the resolution that passed both community (dev@kudu) and incubator ([email protected]) and then paste into board agenda for next board meeting. 4. Wait for board meeting and see if board approves - if so, graduated and then follow next steps TLP guide :) Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 6/27/16, 9:28 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks for the votes of confidence, mentors :) > >What's the next step here? According to >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel it's >traditional for a community to have a VOTE thread. Should we start such a >vote (either on dev@ or on user@? not sure how broad a community). Or is >this DISCUSS thread enough, and we should start to prepare a charter? > >Should we notify the incubator list that these discussions are starting? > >Thanks >-Todd > >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 on TLP. Duh on Todd. >> >> I like the idea of inviting Justin Mclean. >> >> St.Ack >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I'll suggest a slight tweak: we should have the initial PMC be composed >> > > only of those PPMC and mentors who have been *active* during >> incubation. >> > > That would mean dropping a few committers who were on the initial >> > proposal >> > > but haven't shown up at the ASF, as well as a few mentors who haven't >> > taken >> > > part in votes or discussion. Conversely, we could consider inviting a >> > > couple of folks from the IPMC who _have_ been active in release votes, >> if >> > > they'd like to join (eg Justin Mclean comes to mind). >> > > >> > >> > +1, this seems reasonable to me. Because they have not been participating >> > in the Apache process, I think it's justifiable to remove them at this >> > point in time. >> > >> > OTOH, if any of those pre-ASF core contributors come back and want to >> > contribute to the project again, I'd personally be fairly quick to >> nominate >> > them for ASF committership. >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > > > >-- >Todd Lipcon >Software Engineer, Cloudera
